‘Try to work it out,' Lexington County legislators push county officials to make changes after canceled road maintenance agreement

Posted 3/27/24

The Lexington County legislative delegation met with Lexington County Council members and representatives of the county’s municipalities on March 19 to resolve differences over road maintenance agreements.

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Subscribe to continue reading. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Get 50% of all subscriptions for a limited time. Subscribe today.

You can cancel anytime.
 

Please log in to continue

Log in

‘Try to work it out,' Lexington County legislators push county officials to make changes after canceled road maintenance agreement

Posted

The Lexington County legislative delegation met with Lexington County Council members and representatives of the county’s municipalities on March 19 to resolve differences over road maintenance agreements.

There wasn’t any agreement reached at the meeting, but Sen. Ronnie Cromer, R-Newberry, said the problem can be resolved.

“We want them to get together and try to work it out,” he said in an interview with the Chronicle.

Sen. Katrina Shealy, R-Lexington, chairwoman of the delegation, held a similar view. She said the council should have had a meeting with local municipalities before adopting the new plan. 

Shealy told The Chronicle she is hopeful that the council will respond to the concerns expressed during the meeting. If the council does not address the problem, Shealy said the delegation has the option to step in and make change.

The conflict arose after Lexington County Council canceled a road service maintenance agreement with municipalities that has been in effect since 1978. The county is offering a new agreement that would require new residential developments annexed into a town or city to meet Lexington County’s development standards in order for the county to continue road maintenance services.

But that’s not going over well with municipalities. Most have refused to sign off on the agreement.

Irmo Mayor Bill Danielson said he was pleased the meeting was held with lawmakers who could help modify the agreements.

“We got their attention,” Danielson said.

But Danielson and other municipal officials are concerned that Lexington County Council has turned its back on local governments.

“It’s a unilateral decision made in the dark of the night,” Danielson said of the county’s new plan to require municipalities to comply with the county’s development plans when new developments are annexed into a town or city.

The county’s new agreement policy has an impact on 14 towns and cities within Lexington County that received maintenance services on roads and drainage systems.

Many of them have sent out resolutions expressing their concerns.

A resolution adopted by the Irmo Council recommends the transportation committee that approves funding allocations include representatives of municipalities. Currently, the committee is made up of Lexington County Council members.

Lexington County Council recently adopted a resolution urging the delegation to leave the current committee as is.

A solution to the problem remains uncertain, but Lexington County Council’s handling of the conflicts will be under the scrutiny of the legislative delegation.

Lexington County legislative delegation, Lexington County Council, Ronnie Cromer, Katrina Shealy

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here