Expert calls for end to monopolies, regulators
PSC protects monopoly utilities, not consumers
Posted 10/27/20
By Jerry Bellune
JerryBellune@yahoo.com
SC utility regulators do not protect ratepayers.
The Public Service Commission protects utility executives, their investors, lenders and …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Subscribe to continue reading. Already a subscriber? Sign in
Get 50% of all subscriptions for a limited time. Subscribe today.
You can cancel anytime.
Please log in to continue |
Expert calls for end to monopolies, regulators
PSC protects monopoly utilities, not consumers
Public Service Commission hearings draw crowds of ratepayers
Posted
By Jerry Bellune
JerryBellune@yahoo.com
SC utility regulators do not protect ratepayers.
The Public Service Commission protects utility executives, their investors, lenders and profits.
That’s the assessment of a veteran energy expert on SC’s regulated monopolies.
“The idea that utility regulators protect customers is completely wrong,” says Jim Clarkson, CEO of Resource Supply Management.
Clarkson advises major electricity users on how to control their energy costs.
He said the real purpose of state regulation is to protect utilities from competition and assure they recover bad investment costs such as the failed $9 billion SCANA-Santee Cooper twin nuclear reactor project.
The Chronicle has asked the PSC, the Office of Regulatory Staff and Dominion Energy, which now owns SCANA, for comment.
In a note to his clients shared with the Chronicle, Clarkson wrote, “In the PSC’s worse decisions, SCANA’s investors were favored over customers.”
SCANA – now owned by Dominion Energy – made a huge mistake in building a nuclear plant, he said.
With the PSC’s approval, Dominion now wants a 7.7% rate hike to collect millions to pay off the debt.
“When seeking approval to collect the multi-billion-dollar debt, SCANA said they would go bankrupt if they could not pass the cost to the party least guilty, customers of the debacle.
The PSC should have denied recovery of any cost and let nature take its course. Bankruptcy would have been a better choice.”
Another energy expert, Tom Clements of Savannah River Watch, agreed.
“While a case can be made to abolish the PSC which has always been in the pocket of the utilities,” Clements told the Chronicle, “a more significant initial step would be the elimination of the monopolies.
“The legislature should allow competition which would defang the PSC.”
For the rest of what Clarkson and Clements had to say, see Thursday's Chronicle.
Keywords
public, Servce, Commission, dominion, energy, SCANA
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here